Jurist
DONATE NOW
  • News ▾
    • All Legal News
    • US Legal News
    • World Legal News
    • This Day @ Law
  • Dispatches ▾
    • All Dispatches
    • Afghanistan
    • Canada
    • EU
    • Ghana
    • India
    • Iran
    • Israel
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kenya
    • Myanmar
    • Pakistan
    • Peru
    • Sri Lanka
    • UK
    • Ukraine
    • US
  • Commentary ▾
    • All Commentary
    • Faculty Commentary
    • Professional Commentary
    • Student Commentary
  • Features ▾
    • All Features
    • Explainers
    • Long Reads
    • Multimedia
    • Interviews
  • Topics
  • Rule of Law ▾
    • Materials
    • Podcasts
  • About ▾
    • FAQ
    • Staff
    • Awards
    • Apply
    • Journalist in Residence
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • Donate ▾
    • Why Support JURIST?
    • Donate
    • Honor Roll
Commentary The Real Danger of Presidential Spying
The Real Danger of Presidential Spying
JURIST Staff
January 30, 2006 08:01:00 am

JURIST Guest Columnist Brian J. Foley of Florida Coastal School of Law says that the greatest threat posed by President Bush's domestic surveillance program is not to the privacy of ordinary Americans but rather to the independence of potential political...

READ MORE ▸
Commentary Alito's Discrimination Problem
Alito's Discrimination Problem
JURIST Staff
January 28, 2006 08:01:00 am

JURIST Guest Columnist David Kairys of Temple University School of Law says that the Senate should fully examine Judge Samuel Alito's views on race and gender discrimination - strangely shaped in the turmoil of the 1960s - before voting on...

READ MORE ▸
Commentary PATRIOT Games: Terrorism Law and Executive Power
PATRIOT Games: Terrorism Law and Executive Power
JURIST Staff
January 26, 2006 08:01:00 am

JURIST Guest Columnist Susan Herman of Brooklyn Law School says that reauthorization of the USA PATRIOT Act is up for debate again in Congress just as revelations about the NSA domestic surveillance program remind us why executive power needs to...

READ MORE ▸
Commentary Much Pain, Much Gain: Skeptical Ruminations on the Vioxx Litigation
Much Pain, Much Gain: Skeptical Ruminations on the Vioxx Litigation
JURIST Staff
January 23, 2006 08:01:00 am

JURIST Guest Columnist Benjamin Zipursky of Fordham University School of Law says that the ongoing Vioxx litigation is exposing serious shortcomings in America's products liability system... In August, a jury in Texas arrived at a huge verdict of $253 million...

READ MORE ▸
Commentary Legal Technicalities: Weighing the Alito Nomination
Legal Technicalities: Weighing the Alito Nomination
JURIST Staff
January 23, 2006 08:01:00 am

JURIST Guest Columnist David Kairys of Temple University School of Law says that senators weighing the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the US Supreme Court should be wary of endorsing his commitment to legal technicalities over core constitutional values......

READ MORE ▸
Commentary Abramoff and Congressional Reform
Abramoff and Congressional Reform
JURIST Staff
January 20, 2006 08:01:00 am

JURIST Guest Columnist Peter Henning of Wayne State University Law School says that while lawmakers in Washington are floating new ethics regulations in the wake of the Abramoff lobbying scandal, they might do better to apply existing laws and work...

READ MORE ▸
Commentary Hiding Behind 'Principles': The US and the Geneva Conventions
Hiding Behind 'Principles': The US and the Geneva Conventions
JURIST Staff
January 18, 2006 08:01:00 am

JURIST Guest Columnist Geoffrey S. Corn, Lt. Col. US Army (Ret.) and former Special Assistant to the Judge Advocate General for Law of War Matters, now a professor at South Texas College of Law, says that US claims of adherence...

READ MORE ▸
Commentary Hollow Ritual: The Alito Confirmation Hearings
Hollow Ritual: The Alito Confirmation Hearings
JURIST Staff
January 17, 2006 08:01:00 am

JURIST Guest Columnist Peter Shane of Moritz College of Law, Ohio State University, says that the confirmation hearings for US Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito were a distressingly hollow ritual that reflected poorly on the nominee, the Senators questioning...

READ MORE ▸
Commentary AUMF and the Ever-Increasing Importance of Padilla
AUMF and the Ever-Increasing Importance of Padilla
JURIST Staff
January 17, 2006 08:01:00 am

JURIST Guest Columnist Stephen Vladeck of the University of Miami School of Law says that for all the issues presented at various junctures by the Jose Padilla case, none is more important - nor, at this point, more politically sensitive...

READ MORE ▸
Commentary Heeding MLK's Call to Action
Heeding MLK's Call to Action
JURIST Staff
January 16, 2006 08:01:00 am

JURIST Guest Columnist Benjamin Davis of the University of Toledo College of Law says that the memory and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) calls us from complacency and careerism to act against injustice and help the poor...

READ MORE ▸
  1. Newest
  2. Newer
  3. ...
  4. 52
  5. 53
  6. 54
  7. 55
  8. 56
  9. ...
  10. Older
  11. Oldest
Law students to join jurist
GET OUR DAILY DIGEST
LinkedIn YouTube Instagram Facebook RSS Twitter
Latest DISPATCHES
Peru dispatch: protesters demand new elections as death toll from political violence surges under newly sworn-in president

Peru dispatch: protesters demand new elections as death toll from political violence surges under newly sworn-in president

UK dispatch: leading barristers say that Britain’s courts are crumbling

UK dispatch: leading barristers say that Britain’s courts are crumbling

Latest COMMENTARY
Post september 4

Post september 4

by justia.admin
post #82

post #82

by justia.admin
Latest FEATURES
THIS DAY @ LAW

First Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia

On September 5, 1774, the first assembly of the Continental Congress, forerunner of the US Congress, convened in Philadelphia to protest the so-called "Intolerable Acts" passed by the British Parliament. Review the Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress.

France passes conscription law

On September 5, 1798, France promulgated a conscription policy with the passage of the Jourdan Law. The law instituted a draft for all males between the ages of twenty and twenty-five with exceptions for clergy, holders of public office, and certain students and industrial workers. The law also allowed the wealthy to pay for someone else to take their place in the military.

Jurist
Home Attributions Disclaimer Privacy Policy Contact Us
Copyright © 2025, JURIST Legal News & Research Services, Inc.
JURISTnews is a collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh